Trivandrum **1 - Richard Jenkinson

| Camera: | Contax G2 |
| Lens: | Carl Zeiss Planar 45mm f/2 |
| Film: | Ilford Delta 400 |
| Exposure: | |
| Flash: | |
| Support: | |
| Filter: | |
| Adjustment: | Photoshop CS Contrast/Brightness and cropped |
| Posted: | 02-Oct-2005 |
Rating: 8.56 (16 ratings)
Comments
Richard!
This is a very nice Shot!
John Del Gatto 02-Oct-2005 at 21:20Impressive
but the face on the right keeps bothering me - the way it's been cropped and the posterized black spots on the shoulder and the upper lip make it somewhat distracting.
Wilfred van der Vegte 03-Oct-2005 at 00:29Hi Richard, Very good composition and strong image.
Mark 03-Oct-2005 at 01:43Great
image.
[Unknown] 03-Oct-2005 at 07:29Impressive
I am really impressed by this photo ! A really nice shot for me too ! Thanks for sharing all your beautiful Photos. vadc When I see this photo I feel that I took the right choice few weekd ago to invest in a G2...
vadc 03-Oct-2005 at 12:01Thanks
for all the kind remarks and generous ratings. Wilfred, I entirely agree regarding the face on the right. The cropping I can do nothing about as the photo's full frame on this corner- the moment's gone. The "posterising" presumably I can. I am not a technophile; I fumble my way through Photoshop until I happen upon the image result I imagined I would have achieved in a darkroom. I read (with equal measures of awe and bewilderment) comments left on this site regarding digital evolution/editing. (Read, for example, Leslie Hancock's dazzling and eloquent insights into digi v anaolg on ID 14813). The result of this ignorance is to post images with imperfections that didn't exist as a scanned TIFF image or whilst editing in PSD format or, indeed, when I uploaded the final JPEG image. Any ideas as to why this digital phenomenon has occurred and how I can prevent it happening again? Thanks again. Richard
Richard Jenkinson 03-Oct-2005 at 14:43nice
Very dramatic....I wish I would've been there
Steve Garza 03-Oct-2005 at 19:14Posterized spots
Richard, the spots may have to do with your scanner and/or the way you processed the scan (especially increasing detail in the shadows using curves). What type of scanner did you use? Did you scan in 8-bits mode or 16-bits mode?
Wilfred van der Vegte 04-Oct-2005 at 01:53Oops
sorry, I hadn't noticed that you included the type of scanner. Still the question seems relevant whether you scanned and edited in 16 bits or 8 bits.
Wilfred van der Vegte 04-Oct-2005 at 02:01Bit depth
Wilfred. I've just checked, the negative was scanned in greyscale at 8 bits. Would 16 bits improve the quality?
Richard Jenkinson 04-Oct-2005 at 04:08Yes
16 bits might help to overcome posterization, i.e. gradual transitions in greytones becoming sudden transitions. It looks like that's what happened with the spots.
Wilfred van der Vegte 04-Oct-2005 at 05:12Okay
Thanks for that Wilfred
Richard Jenkinson 04-Oct-2005 at 12:59
ARCHIVE